tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093949.post8797846575537060979..comments2023-10-12T00:22:40.014+10:00Comments on Bush Out: Where Now On The Financial Front?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093949.post-59683318113142095492008-01-11T15:34:00.000+10:002008-01-11T15:34:00.000+10:00Actually, Bukko, you know what? It's not that big ...Actually, Bukko, you know what? It's not that big an Internets at all - there are a small handful of indespensible sites like antiwar.com and ICH which, if they disappeared, would leave our entire planet much the worse off. <BR/><BR/>Blogs like mine frequently just "feed" off their content, although I do try to attribute links whenever I find a story though such a site (I get lazy, of course). <BR/><BR/>But we should all be supporting these excellent sites as much as possible!Jaraparillahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06336314539987735082noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5093949.post-80892212437197843422008-01-11T12:42:00.000+10:002008-01-11T12:42:00.000+10:00Holy crap! You're linking to an ICH post which cit...Holy crap! You're linking to an ICH post which cites <A HREF="http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/" REL="nofollow">Mish's blog</A>, which is where I've been turning to for the past two weeks for economic perspectives, after discovering it relatively recently.<BR/><BR/>It's a big, big world on the Internets tubes, and it's hard to know if the sites that strike me as sensible are held in high regard by anyone other than a handful of tinfoil-hatters who stumble across them. (Like your sites, G.) It validates my opinion to see that other people are paying attention to the same things I'm paying attention to.Bukko Boomerangerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02424677168216647964noreply@blogger.com