The cat is now out of the bag.
Under increasing pressure from all sides, including his fellow Republicans, George Bush has finally come clean and admitted the truth - Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11.
"We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in Sept. 11."
It is fascinating to watch the story of Bush's admission hitting Number One on news sites around the world. I clicked on the Google link to the Guardian story, then clicked "related stories" and got just one page of links. I clicked again a few minutes later and there were more than three pages. Surely this is going to be big news, particularly as seven in ten US citizens still believe Saddam and 9/11 were linked?
Bush's statement comes hot on the heels of similar retractions from Cheney (who was forced to retract statements made over the weekend - see below), Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz.
Rumsfeld on Tuesday, asked about links between Saddam and 9/11:
"I've not seen any indication that would lead me to believe that I could say that.''
Cheney on Sunday, talking to Meet The Press host Tim Russsert:
"'Reconstituted nuclear weapons.' You misspoke?"
"Yeah, I did misspeak .... We never had any evidence that he had acquired a nuclear weapon."
Wolfowitz on Firday, challenged about a TV claim that "a great many of bin Laden's key lieutenants are now trying to organize in cooperation with old loyalists from the Saddam regime to attack in Iraq":
"Zarqawi is actually the guy I was referring to – should have been more precise... It's not a great many – it's one of bin Laden's key associates – probably better referred to that way than a key lieutenant."
So what is the new administration take going to be? Condoleeza Rice was already preparing the ground yesterday, saying the administration never actually SAID THAT.
What are you going to call these habitual White House lies? Political Spin? Betrayal of trust? Tampering? Censoring? A disregard for truth? Overstatement for emphasis?
Cheney, who is now using the Orwellian word "mis-speak", might have been wheeled out of the cupboard just to take the fall on this one.
Pages
Blog Archive
-
▼
2003
(222)
-
▼
September
(36)
- Will all future elections be stolen? Bush stole t...
- TIME for a change... Time magazine's latest cover...
- President Wesley Clark? I don't think so... Of co...
- Dude, where's my country?
- Here's a thought. The US and the UN are suddenly p...
- Did the Iraq Sanctions Work? With a new CIA repor...
- It's not often critics like me get to gloat at Bus...
- Bush Bombs at the UN There's not much to say abou...
- Sit down, boys. It's time to carve up the turkey! ...
- I really don't know what to make of this... On a...
- Dumb Animals Once again I feel ashamed to be Aust...
- Good news for Chechens Putin claims the war is ov...
- The 25 Most Under-Reported News Stories of the Yea...
- The cat is now out of the bag. Under increasing ...
- Seeing Through the Smoke... Australian PM John Ho...
- Dirty Deeds Down Under Like his counterpart in th...
- Bring Out The Gimp Dick Cheney doesn't get out mu...
- Globalisation = Hegemony? Those who campaign agai...
- The latest news on Powell's efforts to involve int...
- How Embarrassment! It looks like there will be li...
- Curriculum Vitae: George W. Bush Jnr. George W. B...
- What's gone wrong since 9/11/01? Everything. Bus...
- Don't Deal With Evil In an effort to fund his fai...
- Bush Is Our Greatest Danger Alternet.org has been...
- Rumsfeld Responds to Questions on WMDs The follow...
- Lies, lies, lies Bush's speech to his peasantry, ...
- Come In, Spinner... Last night I heard that El Bu...
- Mario Vargas Llosa in Baghdad: "People cannot liv...
- Rall for Prez? As today's editiorial in the Arab ...
- Will the Trickle Become A Flood...? All it takes ...
- Humble Pie The Powell-inspired decision to invoke...
- The Business of War Like many others, I have long...
- The Worm Turns? After years of being ignored by t...
- Baghdad Burning The following is an excerpt from ...
- Crazy Stuff A pychologist assessing Bush's person...
- Bring 'em on...
-
▼
September
(36)