Afghanistan is a hopeless cause for the West, worse than Iraq. The Karzai Government has no legitimacy, and virtually no presence outside Kabul. The warlords are back in charge in the West of the country. Poppy production has returned to pre-war levels, and the Taliban (still supported by Pakistan) is resurgent and increasingly lethal. Washington can no longer spare the troops (not that they were any good at defeating the Taliban) but NATO, which has been handed the ultimate shit sandwich, can’t convince its members to supply replacements and has had to look to Australia and others to make up the numbers.Via Antony Loewenstein.
It is not even clear why Western troops are still there. The initial UN SC resolution said nothing about regime change (which has been accomplished as it has in Iraq). Removing the Taliban was added as a war aim 3 weeks after hostilities had begun - an afterthought. So what is the mission now (protecting the Government from its people?) and how do you define victory? Why not withdraw the troops and ask Mr Howard’s favourite dictator, Pervez Musharraf, to put the squeeze on them?
And stop calling it “terrorism central” unless you are conceding the US-led invasion and occupation has been a complete failure. It has been but Afghanistan was never the main problem.