August 11, 2006

George W. Bush Believess There Is No Reason To Stop This NOW!

We in Lebanon call upon the international community and citizens everywhere to support my country's sovereignty and end this folly now. We also insist that Israel be made to respect international humanitarian law, including the provisions of the Geneva Conventions, which it has repeatedly and willfully violated.
Lebanon's well-known achievements in 15 years of postwar development have been wiped out in a matter of days by Israel's deadly military might.

For all this carnage and death, and on behalf of all Lebanese, we demand an international inquiry into Israel's criminal actions in Lebanon and insist that Israel pay compensation for its wanton destruction.
Enough destruction, dispossession, desperation, displacement and death! Lebanon must be allowed to reclaim its position in this troubled region as a beacon of freedom and democracy where justice and the rule of law prevail, and as a refuge for the oppressed where moderation, tolerance and enlightenment triumph.

From ICH.
Amazon.com: Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq by Thomas E. Ricks
Un-Australian

Are our troops fighting a dirty Afghan war?
I was sitting in the office of Uruzgan's Governor, Abdul Munib, filming an interview with him in May this year when two Australian officers and an American walked in complete with body armour and weapons.

The Governor introduced me as an Australian journalist and the two Australian officers simply ran out of the room, leaving their American colleague to turn to the Governor stammering, "you must understand, we really have very strict rules with the press".
So what was this reporter doig in Afghanistan anyway?
My whole reason for being in Afghanistan was to report on the situation in the area where the Australians were to be based and where, as John Howard announced this week, a total of 600 Australians will be serving by the end of the year.

After all the difficulty in getting there, what I found was a town that was essentially cut off from the rest of the country by now very strong Taliban forces. The local police chief told me he could no longer send even heavily armed patrols more than 10 kilometres in any direction without facing certain attack. The doctors at the hospital told me they could not go more than 2 kilometres from the town centre for fear for their lives from Taliban.
They Are Not Terrorists Anymore, They Are Fascists

Well, he finally said it:
Speaking briefly on a visit to Wisconsin, Bush said the foiled plane plot was "a stark reminder that this nation is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation."
If the media don't call Bush out on this one, I will just crawl into a hole somewhere and give up.

There is absolutely NO reasonable definition of the word "Fascism" - a right-wing authoritarian doctrine characterized by militant nationalism and control of government by business interests - that can logically be applied to Al Quaeda, the insurgents in Iraq, or any other Bush opponents.

As Franklin Delano Roosevelt said to Congress in 1938:
The first truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in essence, is fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling power. Among us today a concentration of private power without equal in history is growing.
Roosevelt fought the Nazis in WWII. He knew a thing or two about Fascism.

And let's not forget that Prescott Bush, W's grandfather, was on the Fascist side, along with a whole host of US millionaires who had invested heavily in post-WWI Germany and who strongly opposed US intervention in WWII becuae they placed profiteering ahead of morality (and still do).

The stark, screaming, totally unpalatable truth is
that BUSH & CO ARE THE FASCISTS!!!

So why is Bush now calling the terrorists "Fascists"? Well, this is just more classic Rove tactics: take your biggest weakness and turn it against your opponents. People have been comparing Bush to Hitler for more than five years. It hurt, because it was too close to the truth. So (following their proscribed GOP-Rove Talking Points) the sub-intelligent mob known as the "wingnuts" started calling anyone who criticized them Fascists (they are still doing it). It wasn't long before the word "Islamofascist" was born, as a convenient catch-all for anyone who opposed Bush on any grounds whatsoever.

Until now, it is a term that has remained confined to the dark corners of right-wing blogs. That Bush chooses to use the words "Islamic Fascists" in public is a very clear indication that he remains in thrall to the discredited, illogical and highly dangerous ideology of the neo-conservative fanatics.

These are dangerous times indeed.

UPDATE: A minor note of protest in the Reuters report:
U.S. Muslim groups criticized Bush, saying his choice of words could inflame anti-Muslim tensions.
"The problem with the phrase is it attaches the religion of Islam to tyranny and fascism, rather than isolating the threat to a specific group of individuals," said Edina Lekovic, spokeswoman for the Muslim Public Affairs Council in Los Angeles.
But that is the whole point, isn't it? To generate xenophobic hysteria against the entire Moslem world, create a new enemy to replace the Commies, keep the terrified Christian Right donating generously, and keep the wheels of the US military-industrial complex churning out profits.
Just look at this newspaper editorial from Brownsville, Texas:
Wake up, America!

There is no way to say this nicely: There are Islamic fascists who want to enslave you or kill you! No, you can’t reason with them. No, you can’t negotiate with them. They believe that they are doing God’s will. So you’re not going to be able to sit down with coffee or tea and talk sense with them.

They want you, your family, and all you love dead. To them you are an infidel, less than human, a rat or pig. You are scum or a cancer to be destroyed.

They want to make the whole world an Islamic world ruled by Islamic law. Remember the Taliban? Ladies, get your burkas ready!

Our enemies are deadly serious and are doining everything possible to reach their goal. Right now Iran, the No. 1 sponsor of terrorism, is on its way to completing a nuclear bomb. Its psychopath of a president has boldly proclaimed he wants to wipe Israel off the face of the earth.

To them, we are the great Satan!

Are you ready for Iranian nukes?

There are approximately 1.5 billion Muslims around the world. About 10 percent to 15 percent are radical nuts. Do the math. That’s a lot of genocidal maniacs. They would just love to enter your kid’s school and blow it up so they can get their 70 virgins.
UPDATE 2: They are not jsut "Fascists", they are "Imperialists" too! Here's Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff on MSNBC:
It may not be classic fascism as you had with Mussolini or Hitler. But it is a totalitarian, intolerant imperialism that has a vision that is totally at odds with Western society and our rules of law.
Mohamed Elibiary, a Texas-based Muslim activist, provides a breath of reason:
We've got Osama bin Laden hijacking the religion in order to define it one way ... We feel the president and anyone who's using these kinds of terminologies is hijacking it too from a different side. The president's use of the language is going to ratchet up the hate meter...
Exactly. Exploiting fear and hatred for political gain. It's all they've got left.

August 10, 2006

Yeah, that RED ALERT was way overdue, wasn't it?
How Far Might This US Corruption Thing Go?

Counterintelligence Officials Resign...
No More

no more no more...

August 09, 2006

Get Active!

Send George Bush a pet fish.
Kings Of Kirribilli

John and Janette's Emerald City reality:
Anyone imagining Hyacinth Bucket might willingly leave Kirribilli House has clearly not been paying attention.
Lieberman Concedes Defeat In Senate Race
Bye Bye Karzai

Fortune: Karzai refuses to run for re-election:
In an exclusive interview with Fortune, the 49-year-old Karzai said, "I don't think it is good to be running all the time. Let other people get a chance to run."
Or, in other words:
I have become such a US stooge that even another multi-million dollar PR blitz of poor, uneducated Afghans will not be enough to get me re-elected. Besides, I have enough money to retire in comfort on the Cote D'Azur now.
Bush Breaks With Condi

From the Conservative magazine Insight:

"I've never seen her so angry," an aide said.

The U.S. response to the Israeli-Hezbollah war was said to have divided both the administration as well as the family of President George W. Bush. At the same time, it marked the first time since Ms. Rice became secretary of state that the president has overruled her.

"For the last 18 months, Condi was given nearly carte blanche in setting foreign policy guidelines," a senior government source familiar with the issue said. "All of a sudden, the president has a different opinion and he wants the last word."
So if Condi is not telling George what to think any more, who is?
A History Of Violence Against Civilians

Newly declassified files list US atrocities in Vietnam :
Among the substantiated cases in the archive are:

- Seven massacres from 1967 to 1971 in which 137 civilians died.

- Seventy-eight other attacks on non-combatants in which at least 57 were killed, 56 wounded and 15 sexually assaulted.

- One hundred and forty-one incidents in which soldiers tortured civilians or prisoners with fists, sticks, water or electric shock.

Of 203 soldiers accused of harming Vietnamese civilians or prisoners who received formal charges, 57 were court martialled and just 23 convicted; 14 received prison sentences, but most won significant reductions on appeal.

August 08, 2006

It's ALL WRONG!

And this little example proves it. Chile strikes hit BHP copper contracts:
BHP Billiton Ltd has declared a force majeure on copper concentrate contracts, after confirming that strike action has cut capacity at its Escondida mine in Chile to 40 per cent.

"We have declared force majeure on our concentrate contracts," BHP spokeswoman Emma Meade said.

"Our cathode production has been suspended."

Escondida, located in Chile's Atacama Desert, is the largest producer of copper in the world with the lowest costs and is operated by BHP Billiton, which owns a 57.5 per cent stake.

Rio Tinto holds 30 per cent, Jeco Corporation 10 per cent and the World Bank 2.5 per cent.
What the #$%& is the World Bank doing, investing in exploitation of cheap labour?
What Was He Doing There In The First Place?

WaPo:
Exactly six years ago Tuesday, on a sweltering day in Nashville, Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.) was introduced to the nation as Al Gore's vice presidential running mate. Lieberman called his selection "a miracle" and described himself as part of an "American Dream Team."
What Was He Doing There In The First Place?

WaPo:
Exactly six years ago Tuesday, on a sweltering day in Nashville, Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.) was introduced to the nation as Al Gore's vice presidential running mate. Lieberman called his selection "a miracle" and described himself as part of an "American Dream Team."
Bush Goes Over The Cliff

Sign of the times. Half the entries returned from a Google News search for "Bush" are now satirical. Used to be, not long ago, there was one or two only...
Why Does The US Press Give These Neocon Fools A Voice?

How dumb are the US press? This is from Bloomberg Opinion:
The polls are partly to blame for the mood swings.
Oh wait, here's the blurb about the author:
Kevin Hassett is director of economic-policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute.
Well. Why won't Bloomberg publish me? Let's find out, shall we....
We Are Way Out In Left Field Now, Folks...

Scary stuff indeed:
"Whatever happens in the U.N., we must not create a vacuum into which Hezbollah and its sponsors are able to move more weapons," Bush said in a joint news conference with Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice. "Sometimes the world likes to take the easy route in order to solve a problem. Our view is, it's time to address root causes of problems. And to create a vacuum is unacceptable." ...

Bush dressed in suit and tie for the press conference — a departure from the casual dress and more restricted media access that are typical at the ranch. In part, the appearance was designed to show the president is engaged even when he is away from the White House. But Bush has left the negotiations to Rice and other diplomats and has not spoken with the prime ministers of Lebanon or Israel about the U.N. resolutions.

"Condi is handling those conversations, and she's doing a fine job of doing so," Bush said...

"I understand both parties aren't going to agree with all aspects of the resolution," Bush said. "But the intent of the resolutions is to strengthen the Lebanese government so Israel has got a partner in peace." ...

"This international force will help Lebanon patrol its border with Syria and prevent illegal arm shipments to Hezbollah," Bush said. "As these Lebanese and international forces deploy, the Israeli defense forces will withdraw."

Asked why the United States would not contribute ground troops to the international force, Bush compared it to the situation in Sudan's Darfur region. U.S. troops "would create a sensation around the world that may not enable us to achieve our objective," Bush said.
Osama Has Won:
Anyone who even attempts to defend the killing of the children in Qana by Israeli air strikes is criminally insane.
Fisk:
A close analysis of the American-French draft - the fingerprints of John Bolton, the US ambassador to the UN, were almost smudging the paragraphs - showed just who is running Washington's Middle East policy: Israel. And one wondered how even Tony Blair would want to associate himself with this nonsense.
What You Are Not Seeing On US TV News

Arab anger at pro-US governments:
As their anger against Israel and America swells, protesters across the Middle East are also increasingly venting their frustration at their Arab rulers, especially in moderate countries whose governments have been reliable U.S. allies.

Nearly four weeks of fighting between Hezbollah and Israel have aggravated a summer of discontent over the bloodshed in Iraq, stalled democratic reforms and price increases. Angry at their governments, demonstrators are praising a new hero: Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah.

"The whole region has been engulfed in anger since the war on Iraq more than three years ago," said Diaa Rashwan, an Egyptian analyst with the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies. "The frustration is just huge."

The rising resentment is weighing heavily on Arab leaders as their foreign ministers gather in Beirut on Monday for an emergency meeting. Moderates like Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia may want a halt to the fighting, but they can't be seen as backing a U.S.-promoted cease-fire plan that Hezbollah has depicted as a surrender.

Even more worrisome for Arab leaders is the possibility violence may turn on them. On Saturday, al-Qaida announced that an Egyptian militant group had joined the terror network. While the group denied it, many fear that public anger could nonetheless boost militants around the region.

Demonstrators have denounced leaders of Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia for blaming Hezbollah — sometimes implicitly, sometimes overtly — for starting the fighting by snatching two Israeli soldiers in a July 12 cross-border raid.

Three straight days of protests broke out last week among the normally quiet Shiite minority in Saudi Arabia, where demonstrations are rare, though protesters were cautious not to criticize the ruling family. Hundreds of Shiites waved posters of Nasrallah, chanting "Oh Nasrallah; oh beloved one; destroy, destroy Tel Aviv."

Cairo has seen nearly daily demonstrations against Egyptian President
Hosni Mubarak for what protesters see as his failure to support Hezbollah. On Sunday, demonstrators held up a poster of Mubarak with a Star of David on his forehead, labeling him "the enemy of the Egyptian people."

Last week, more than 1,000 protesters rallied in downtown Cairo, burning Israeli and American flags. "Arab majesties, excellencies and highnesses, we spit on you," one banner read.

Similar protests have erupted in Jordan and Kuwait, where anti-U.S. demonstrations are rare.

Lebanon may be the spark, but there's plenty of tinder for the discontent, particularly the situation in Iraq and domestic economic strains.
Madness

"This war must stop now, or it will radicalize the Muslim world, even those of us who are moderate today. It is just one step from there to a clash of civilizations." - Indonesia's President, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, who leads the world's most populous Muslim nation
That quote comes from Glenn Greenwald at Salon's War Room today:
Trends in the Middle East certainly appear to be headed -- quite precipitously -- in the opposite direction from the outcome President Bush says he is pursuing. Violence is exploding in region, not diminishing -- in Iraq, the Palestinian Authority, Lebanon and, soon, quite possibly in Syria, Iran and beyond.

And anti-U.S. hostility is spreading even faster than the violence. The U.S. is perceived as an occupying force in Iraq and as the primary enabler of, if not an outright participant in, the Israeli bombing campaign in Lebanon. The more war we wage in the Middle East, the more violence we create and the more anti-U.S. resentment we spawn, and thus the further away we move from the president's claimed objectives.

Amazingly, the neoconservatives’ response to the patent failure of their warmongering approach is to urge more of the same, just with more intensity and with less restraint. When the violence they urge produces results that are the opposite of what they claim they want to achieve, their solution is never to reconsider the approach but, instead, to urge more violence and more wars.
It's the Stupidity, Stupid!

Half of U.S. still believes Iraq had WMD:
Half of America apparently still thinks so, a new poll finds, and experts see a raft of reasons why: a drumbeat of voices from talk radio to die-hard bloggers to the Oval Office, a surprise headline here or there, a rallying around a partisan flag, and a growing need for people, in their own minds, to justify the war in
Iraq.

People tend to become "independent of reality" in these circumstances, says opinion analyst Steven Kull...

"I'm flabbergasted," said Michael Massing, a media critic whose writings dissected the largely unquestioning U.S. news reporting on the Bush administration's shaky WMD claims in 2002-03.

"This finding just has to cause despair among those of us who hope for an informed public able to draw reasonable conclusions based on evidence," Massing said...

As recently as May 27, Bush told West Point graduates, "When the
United Nations Security Council gave him one final chance to disclose and disarm, or face serious consequences, he refused to take that final opportunity."

"Which isn't true," observed Kathleen Hall Jamieson, a scholar of presidential rhetoric at the University of Pennsylvania. But "it doesn't surprise me when presidents reconstruct reality to make their policies defensible." This president may even have convinced himself it's true, she said.
But wait! There is still hope for Bush's USA:
A German scientist has been testing an "anti-stupidity" pill with encouraging results on mice and fruit flies, Bild newspaper reported Saturday.
Killing Arabs: Bush, Camus and the Politics Of The Absurd
March 23, 2006: An animated President George Bush has termed "absurd" the feeling among some Europeans that the US is more of a threat to stability than North Korea and Iran…
When I first saw this Bush quote, I thought immediately of Camus. For those not familiar with the name, Albert Camus was a famous French-Algerian writer whose work is synonymous with the concept of absurdity.
”At any street corner the feeling of absurdity can strike any man in the face.” - Camus
Along with Jean-Paul Sartre and other intellectuals, Camus developed a school of thought known as Existentialism. Adherents simply refused to believe anything that could not be universally proven to be true. And what can be proven to be true, other than the simple fact that we exist? As Descartes said, “I think, therefore I am.” All else is conjecture.

Stripped to such bare bones, even the basic concept of life itself becomes absurd. Most of us find such a stark reality unpalatable. We lean on various psychological props – religion, wealth, fantasy - to help us ignore this core dilemma of existence. But Camus and his fellow Existentialists bravely embraced such absurdity as the foundation for an ultimately life-affirming philosophy.
“The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion.” - Camus
For a telling recent example of the absurd, nothing can match the Bush administration's Weapons of Mass Destruction ruse. Bush sent a team of men scouring the desert sands of Iraq for more than a year, searching in vain for Saddam’s “elusive” WMDs. And yet at least some of the senior figures in the Bush administration knew those WMDs did not exist – because they themselves had set up a secretive Office Of Special Plans to help fabricate the WMD ruse. As a metaphor for man’s life on earth, Camus cited the eternal task of Sisyphus: repeatedly pushing a rock to the top of a mountain, only to watch it roll down the other side. The mission of Charles Deulfer’s Iraq Survey Group was no less absurd.
”The only real progress lies in learning to be wrong all alone.“ – Camus
To fully appreciate Camus, it is important to distinguish between absurdity and similar concepts such as irony and ridiculousness. For example, it is ridiculous that an intellectual lightweight like George W. Bush ever became President of the USA. It’s ironic that the man who holds probably the most powerful office in the history of our planet is a shallow, easily manipulated fool. But we begin to approach the absurd when we realize that, after half a decade of death, war, stuff-ups, and cover-ups, millions of people across the USA still do not know, or refuse to acknowledge, how criminally incompetent Bush truly is.

Some, including top politicians and government officials, refuse to acknowledge this harsh truth because they do not want to consciously have to deal with it. Others, even as they are forced to acknowledge the truth, willfully refuse to learn the lessons implicit in the unfolding disaster. Such self-constructed fantasies help us all deal with forces - including wars and hurricanes, terror and absurdity - which are seemingly beyond our ability to influence.
”Ah, mon cher, for anyone who is alone, without God and without a master, the weight of days is dreadful.” - Camus
Camus’ writing is marked by an intellectual rigor that shines like a bright light through all his work. By contrast, Bush cannot even be bothered to analyze complex issues in anything more than a superficial way.
“What they need to do is get Syria to get Hizbollah to stop doing this shit and it’s over.” – G. W. Bush
Bush actually quoted Camus once, at the start of his second term, when he was visiting Brussels and desperately (and unsuccessfully) trying to mend fences with “Old Europe” :
”We know there are many obstacles, and we know the road is long. Albert Camus said that, "Freedom is a long-distance race." We're in that race for the duration -- and there is reason for optimism. Oppression is not the wave of the future; it is the desperate tactic of a few backward-looking men. Democratic nations grow in strength because they reward and respect the creative gifts of their people. And freedom is the direction of history, because freedom is the permanent hope of humanity.” - George W. Bush, February 22, 2005
However well-intentioned the gesture may have been, the Camus quote was generally not well received. Gary Leupp’s reaction spoke for many of us:
For Bush, a cocksure man full of worthless certainties, who seeks to impose fundamentalist Christian morality, sideline science and actually diminish freedom in the name of the "war on terror," to invoke Camus is an outrage. Surely some in the Brussels audience wanted to puke.
To make matters worse, Bush’s speech-writers had actually taken Camus out of context. A careful reading reveals that Camus was being sarcastic:
The paragraph from which the president quoted begins by having Clamence extolling slavery, as Camus believed Sartre had done by aligning himself with the French Communist Party. Then Camus has Clamence condemn himself of hypocrisy, for which Camus criticized Sartre in his journal, by saying that that he "was always talking of freedom. At breakfast I used to spread it on my toast, I used to chew it all day long, and in company my breath was delightfully redolent of freedom. With that key word I would bludgeon whoever contradicted me; I made it serve my desires and my power."
Ah, yes! Freedom, one of George W. Bush’s favourite words!
“When a war breaks out, people say: "It's too stupid, it can't last long." But though a war may be "too stupid," that doesn't prevent its lasting. “ – Camus
My favourite Camus book is L’Etranger (The Stranger), which makes repeated use of the scorching Algerian sun as a metaphor for the glaring illumination of objective truth in our lives. Bathed in this white-hot glow, the absurdity of our petty human follies becomes all the more obvious...
President Bush on Tuesday dismissed a human rights report as "absurd " for its harsh criticism of U.S. treatment of terrorist suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, saying the allegations were made by prisoners "who hate America."

"It's an absurd allegation. The United States is a country that promotes freedom around the world," Bush said of the Amnesty International report that compared Guantanamo to a Soviet-era gulag...

Standing in the sun, sweat beading on his forehead, Bush said the job of the U.S. forces in Iraq is to help train the nation's own forces to defeat insurgents.

"I think the Iraqi people dealt the insurgents a serious blow when we had the elections," Bush said. "In other words, what the insurgents fear is democracy because democracy is the opposition of their vision."
Fear and terror. Politics and war. Democracy and Dictatorship. These arenas illustrate the awful differences between an obfuscator like Bush and a man of real moral clarity, like Camus.
“Nothing is more despicable than respect based on fear.” – Camus
Camus was born in the dying days of the French Empire, in a colony that became synonymous with militant Islamic fundamentalism before the World Trade Centre had even been built:
Born November 7th, 1913 in Algeria son of French 'pied-noir' settlers Camus grew up in poverty in the proletarian neighbourhood of Belcourt in Algiers. Camus's mother, Catherine Hélène Sintés, was an illiterate cleaning woman. She came from a family of Spanish origin. Lucien Auguste Camus, his father, was an itinerant agricultural laborer. He died of his wounds in 1914 after the Battle of the Marne - Camus was less than a year old at that time.
In his early twenties, Camus was expelled from the Algerian Communist Party because he supported the nationalist aspirations of down-trodden native Algerians. At the same age, George W. Bush was busy going AWOL from the National Guard.

In his early thirties, Camus wrote and edited Combat, the underground newspaper of the French Resistance in WWII. By this time, Camus was already becoming famous beyond the intellectual classes. At the same age, George W. Bush was busy snorting cocaine and being arrested for DUI.

In his early forties, during the Algerian War of Independence, Camus argued for peaceful coexistence and called for a truce to spare civilians, which both warring sides regarded as foolish. He worked clandestinely for imprisoned Algerians facing the death penalty.
”There will be no lasting peace either in the heart of individuals or in social customs until death is outlawed.” – Camus
At the same age, George W. Bush was just embarking on his political career, helping his father win the US Presidency before successfully running for Governor of Texas. As governor, Bush sent a record 150 prison inmates to their deaths. As President, he has blithely overseen the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, Afghans and (more recently) Lebanese.

Camus was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1957. Three years later, he died in a car accident.

Bush is still alive and dangerous, with a further two years to run on his Presidency. He remains surrounded by people with no more intellectual capacity or moral clarity than himself.
“I don't know anybody who has even talked or contemplated the prospect of a nuclear strike in Iran and that would be absolutely absurd." - Tony Blair


“Blair and Bush are now alone in their own theatre of the absurd.” - Alan Simpson, a UK MP.


* * *

Selected quotes from Albert Camus:
There are already too many dead on the field, and we cannot be generous with any but our own blood.

If there is sin against life, it consists… in hoping for another life and in eluding the implacable grandeur of this life.

Don't wait for the last judgment - it takes place every day.

By definition, a government has no conscience. Sometimes it has a policy, but nothing more.

The modern mind is in complete disarray. Knowledge has stretched itself to the point where neither the world nor our intelligence can find any foot-hold. It is a fact that we are suffering from nihilism.

The myth of unlimited production brings war in its train as inevitably as clouds announce a storm.

The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants.

A free press can, of course, be good or bad, but, most certainly without freedom, the press will never be anything but bad.

A guilty conscience needs to confess. A work of art is a confession.

A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.

A man's work is nothing but this slow trek to rediscover, through the detours of art, those two or three great and simple images in whose presence his heart first opened.

After all manner of professors have done their best for us, the place we are to get knowledge is in books. The true university of these days is a collection of books.

After all, every murderer when he kills runs the risk of the most dreadful of deaths, whereas those who kill him risk nothing except promotion.

Alas, after a certain age every man is responsible for his face.

To assert in any case that a man must be absolutely cut off from society because he is absolutely evil amounts to saying that society is absolutely good, and no-one in his right mind will believe this today.

To insure the adoration of a theorem for any length of time, faith is not enough, a police force is needed as well.

Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principle of evil.

We call first truths those we discover after all the others.

What the world requires of the Christians is that they should continue to be Christians.

It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.

The evil that is in the world almost always comes of ignorance, and good intentions may do as much harm as malevolence if they lack understanding.

We used to wonder where war lived, what it was that made it so vile. And now we realize that we know where it lives...inside ourselves.
"My children died so that John Howard could win an election"

Rejected refugees sent home to die.

August 07, 2006

Glenn Greenwald:
I'm going to write more about this tomorrow, but it is simply amazing how so much of our national pundit class is hopelessly drowning in worthless conventional wisdom, only able to spit out the shallowest and most banal observations which are just self-evidently, indisputably wrong.
Wilkes Goes Down

New York Times has the story:
In 1992, Brent R. Wilkes rented a suite at the Hyatt Hotel a few blocks from the Capitol. In his briefcase was a stack of envelopes for a half-dozen congressmen, each packet containing up to $10,000 in checks...

Offering a rare insider’s view, Mr. Wilkes described the appropriations process as little more than a shakedown. He said that lobbyists close to the committee members unceasingly demanded campaign contributions from entrepreneurs like him. Mr. Wilkes and his associates have given more than $706,000 to federal campaigns since 1997, according to public records, and he said he had brought in more as a fund-raiser. Since 2000, Mr. Wilkes’s principal company has received about $100 million in federal contracts.

Mr. Wilkes described the system bluntly: “Lowery would always say, ‘It is a two-part deal,’ ” he recalled. “ ‘Jerry will make the request. Jerry will carry the vote. Jerry will have plenty of time for this. If you don’t want to make the contributions, chair the fund-raising event, you will get left behind.’ ”
E.J. Dionne suggests such stories and others indicate that Conservatism as a political force is now in rapid decline. True? Maybe, but not if more than half the USA doesn't even know what's going on. As Digby says:
The facts are the facts, but years of "tax and spend liberal" cant has been so internalized that even when the graft and corruption is right in plain sight, people won't belive it.
Keep On Honking!

Victor Kittila tells his story:
I dedicate an hour a week to political action. It's no big deal. It's how I choose to serve my country. My claim to fame? I got arrested. I was walking to an ice-cream store after a peace vigil, with my big HONK sign under my arm, and some young cop arrested me for disturbing that 'peace and quiet' one only finds in the middle of rush hour at 9-Mile and Woodward. Is it irony or what? I think so, but it doesn't make me laugh.
The funny thing is, people are still honking their horns at that intersection EVEN WHEN THERE IS NO SIGN!
Another Sleepless Night:
Military families outside the Capital for 6 weeks and hardly anyone notices....

People on a hunger strike outside the White house on their 27th day and hardly a whisper.

Many participating in acts of civil disobedience no one hears.

Mothers hugging tombstones trying to will their children back to life.

Mothers lying awake at night crying for their children who have returned home and are living in PTSD hells we can’t even fathom -- I am one of these.

Families who feel like they can’t breathe while their loved one is currently in harms way... waiting for the dreaded knock on the door.

Our children injured and maimed.

Dead Iraqi Men, Women, children and babies. More than we even know.

We cry alone and we cry together. Embracing each other through this vile creature called war. It has wrapped us in its arms. I feel no escape.

How much love will it take to end this war? My child is your child and their children are our children and we all are interconnected. Please God end this madness.

America... AMERICA... AMERICA... America, SAVE OUR CHILDREN!!!
Why do half the USA still think Saddam had WMDs? Are they stupid, or Do American’s feel a growing need to justify the war in Iraq?
EU accuses Australia of US bias on trade talks. EU Trade Commissioner Peter Mandelson said:
"If we heard as much messaging to the United States on farm subsidies as we in Europe hear from Australia on market access on agriculture then I think that Australia's approach would be considered a bit more balanced."
Mandelson has rejected Australia's invitation to attend a trade meeting of the Cairns Group next month in Cairns. Under John Howard's government, Australia has been reduced to the status of a de-facto US Puppet Government, along with countries like Palau, Guam and Micronesia.
If and when Libermann goes down to Ned Lamont, Eschaton will deserve a lot of the credit:
No matter what happens on Tuesday, the fact is that this should have never been a race. As big a wanker as Lieberman has been, he should have been able to easily swat away a primary challenge.

I had to think pretty hard about encouraging people to give money to Lamont. I probably thought his chances of winning were about 5% back when this began and I had to consider whether asking people to donate their time and energy for a long shot of a cause was really worthwhile. Ultimatey I decided that it was, but I still never saw it as anything but a tremendous long shot.
One Ring To Rule Them All?

A lot of people are scratching their heads about just what exactly Israel and/or the neo-cons hope to achive from the current conflict in Lebanon.

Juan Cole speculates:
Even an Iranian nuke, of course, would not be an immediate threat to the US, in the absence of ICBMs. But the major US ally in the Middle East, Israel, would be vulnerable to a retaliatory Iranian strike if the US took military action against Iran in order to overthrow the regime and gain the proprietary deals for themselves.

In the short term, Iran was protected by another ace in the hole. It had a client in the Levant, Lebanon's Hizbullah, and had given it a few silkworm rockets, which could theoretically hit Israeli nuclear and chemical facilities. Hizbullah increasingly organizes the Lebanese Shiites, and the Lebanese Shiites will in the next ten to twenty years emerge as a majority in Lebanon, giving Iran a commercial hub on the Mediterranean.

China and India could get Iran, and Iran could get Lebanon, and as non-OPEC energy production decreases, the US and Israel could find themselves out in the cold on the energy front...

It may be that that hawks are thinking this way: Destroy Lebanon, and destroy Hizbullah, and you reduce Iran's strategic depth. Destroy the Iranian nuclear program and you leave it helpless and vulnerable to having done to it what the Israelis did to Lebanon. You leave it vulnerable to regime change, and a dragooning of Iran back into the US sphere of influence, denying it to China and assuring its 500 tcf of natural gas to US corporations. You also politically reorient the entire Gulf, with both Saddam and Khamenei gone, toward the United States. Voila, you avoid peak oil problems in the US until a technological fix can be found, and you avoid a situation where China and India have special access to Iran and the Gulf.

The second American Century ensues. The "New Middle East" means the "American Middle East."

And it all starts with the destruction of Lebanon.

More wars to come, in this scenario, since hitting Lebanon was like hitting a politician's bodyguard. You don't kill a bodyguard just to kill the bodyguard. It is phase I of a bigger operation.
From Informed Comment.
With Friend Like This

Daniel Levy, a former Israeli government negotiator, in Haaretz:
Disentangling Israeli interests from the rubble of neocon "creative destruction" in the Middle East has become an urgent challenge for Israeli policy-makers. An America that seeks to reshape the region through an unsophisticated mixture of bombs and ballots, devoid of local contextual understanding, alliance-building or redressing of grievances, ultimately undermines both itself and Israel...

Israel does have enemies, interests and security imperatives, but there is no logic in the country volunteering itself for the frontline of an ideologically misguided and avoidable war of civilizations.

So what should be done, on both sides of the ocean?

It is admittedly difficult for Israel to have a regional strategy that is out-of-step with the U.S. administration-of-the-day. However, the neocon approach is not unchallenged, and Israel should not be providing its ticket back to the ascendancy. A U.S. return to proactive diplomacy, realism and multilateralism, with sustained and hard engagement that delivers concrete progress, would best serve its own, Israeli and regional interests. Israel should encourage this...

Beyond that, Israel and its friends in the United States should seriously reconsider their alliances not only with the neocons, but also with the Christian Right. The largest "pro-Israel" lobby day during this crisis was mobilized by Pastor John Hagee and his Christians United For Israel, a believer in Armageddon with all its implications for a rather particular end to the Jewish story. This is just asking to become the mother of all dumb, self-defeating and morally abhorrent alliances.

Internationalist Republicans, Democrats and mainstream Israelis must construct an alternative narrative to the neocon nightmare, identifying shared interests in a policy that reestablishes American leadership, respect and credibility in the region by facilitating security and stability, pursuing conflict resolution and promoting the conditions for more open societies (as opposed to narrow election-worship). The last two years of the Bush presidency can be an opportunity for progress or an exercise in desperate damage limitation. It sounds counter-intuitive, but Israel should reflect on and even help reorient American expectations.

August 05, 2006

Thatcher's Rule: Never Admit Mistakes. Ever.

That is the one unifying thread between the US, UK and Australian governments over the past decade, isn't it? And it has worked quite well for them (though the wheels have now fallen orf and they have no original, alternative ideas)...

Indeed, it's hard not to think of the current Lebanon agression as anything but the Bush-Blair-neocons' only-available fling at double-or-nothing. E.G.:
I am told that the Israelis informed George W Bush in advance of their plans to "destroy" Hezbollah by bombing villages in southern Lebanon. The Americans duly informed the British. So Blair knew...

Blair, like Bush, had no intention of urging the Israelis to slow down their bombardment, believing somehow that this struggle was winnable...

One close aide recalls that when the Prime Minister was preparing a foreign-policy speech in his Sedgefield constituency in 2004, a year after the invasion of Iraq, he considered a mea culpa of sorts, but changed his mind, asking his team: "Do we want headlines of 'Blair: I was wrong' or 'Blair: I was right'?"

Whatever he may think alone at night, the Prime Minister is locked in a spiral of self-justification for his actions in Iraq, his broader Middle East policy and his unstinting support of Bush.
Looking back, Blair seemed a decent PM whilst ever he was focussed on domestic issues only. I suspect he took little interest in foreign affairs until he became PM, whereapon he immediately fell into the Bush-neocon trance (for lack of historical perspective). Whaddayareckon?
AWOL

From the Press Gaggle:
MR. SNOW: Let me begin with a couple of points. The President's day today: he got up early, he received his national security briefing, recorded the radio address -- which is about border security and immigration. Then he went out and did some brush-cutting and trail-clearing, followed by a bike ride, and will be doing other vacation relaxation sort of things for the rest of the day.

The week ahead has more of the same...
PADILLA, DAMMIT!!!

Glenn Greenwald is moving beyond mere blogging into something different. I think perhaps he is becoming the media we were supposed to have:
U.S. citizen Jose Padilla was kept by the Bush administration in solitary confinement in a Naval prison for 3 1/2 years without being changed with any crime and without even having access to a lawyer. He was finally charged with crimes only because the administration wanted to avoid a ruling from the Supreme Court on whether it is constitutional for the U.S. government to arrest U.S. citizens on American soil and then keep them indefinitely locked away without charges of any kind -- a power which not even the British King possessed, at least not since the Magna Carta.

When the Bush administration finally indicted Padilla, they did so with extremely vague allegations that had nothing to do with the original public accusations that Padilla was a diabolical "Dirty Bomber" trying to detonate a radiological bomb in an American city. And now that the Bush administration is being forced to actually prove its accusations against Padilla in a court of law -- the way the Founders required -- they are having great difficulty doing so...
As an example of his oevre, here's another recent post from Greenwald, Is Bill Kristol writing George Bush's Middle East speeches?:
Fittingly, the President ended his address with the neoconservative prayer -- that what appears to sane and civilized people as tragic and brutal wars in Iraq and in Lebanon are really glorious "opportunities" which we should celebrate and for which we should be grateful -- beautiful "birth pangs" on the road to a majestic transformation...

The two countries on which Israel is waging war, Lebanon and the Palestinian Authority, both have democratically elected governments, as does, at least to some degree, the country on which we most want to wage war, Iran. By contrast, the closest and most reliable allies we have in that region -- Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan -- are the least democratic. The notion that we can bomb the Middle East into peace-loving, pro-U.S. democracies is painfully, self-evidently absurd by now, but the President believes it.

The neoconservative extremists are ridiculed on an almost daily basis, because the extent of their ever-increasing lunacy is truly difficult to fathom. But that mindset is not merely some fringe radicalism but, instead, has been driving our foreign policy for the last five years. And it still is, because the individual who happens to be the President, along with the omnipotent Vice President, are full-fledged adherents to this approach, and while scores of people marvel at how increasingly deranged the Bill Kristols and Richard Perles of the world seem to be, those who occupy the White House believe they speak great wisdom and are listening intently to (and outright echoing) what they have to say.
Go there, bookmark the site, never come back to this Loser blog again...!
Antiwar.com Blog has an excellent post: The Establishment vs. the Neocons. Insider perspectives!
Wrong in so many ways...



... and yet right in so many others!

August 04, 2006

comments...
BING! BING! BING!

Anyone else hear the warning bells?
The Fed has raised rates at 17 straight policy meetings, beginning in June 2004, in a bid to hold off inflationary pressures.
And yet still, US business activity is below expectations.
638 ways to kill Castro:
Fabian Escalante, who, for a time, had the job of keeping El Commandante alive, has calculated that there have been a total of 638 attempts on Castro's life. That may sound like a staggeringly high figure, but then the CIA were pretty keen on killing him. As Wayne Smith, former head of the US interests section in Havana, pointed out recently, Cuba had the effect on the US that a full moon has on a werewolf.
World's In Turmoil, Bush Goes On Holidays

Really.
Sidney Blumenthal on The neocons' next war!
By secretly providing NSA intelligence to Israel and undermining the hapless Condi Rice, hardliners in the Bush administration are trying to widen the Middle East conflict to Iran and Syria, not stop it.
Fairyland

Olmert doesn't let facts stand in way of a success story.
I beg your pardon?
Along with the sunshine
There’s gotta be a little rain some time
Donald "There is no question but that they would be welcomed" Rumsfeld finally turns up to face Senate inquiry questions on Iraq and says ‘I Have Never Painted A Rosy Picture’.

Facing strong criticism from Hillary Clinton, Rummy said:
"Are there setbacks? Yes. Are there things that people can't anticipate? Yes. Does the enemy have a brain and continue to make adjustments on the ground requiring our forces to make adjustments? You bet.

"Is that going to continue to be the case? I think so. Is this problem going to get solved in the near term about this long struggle against violent extremism? No, I don't believe it is."

He also said:
Does the violence tend to be up during the summer, in the spring, summer and fall months? Yes it does. And it tends to decline during the winter period. Does that represent failed policy? I don’t know. I would say not.
John McCain said the US appeared to be "playing a game of whack-a-mole." Unfortunately, one squinty, smug little mole is not being whacked.

August 03, 2006

Where Are We Heading? How Do We Change Course?

From the comments at AlterNet:
As a nation, we've got to perform a mass mea culpa. We've got to stand up and admit that we made the worse electoral mistake in our history or since the German people foolishly put Adolf Hitler in power in 1933.
My response:
The way I always express it is: "Bush is just a symptom of a very sick society." Getting rid of Bush won't cure the disease - but it's a good first step!

As an Aussie, I have watched the USA in enraged bewilderment for the past three years. It's been excruciating, but educational.

We Aussies have our own sad, Bush-loving excuse for a "democratic" government, of course. And that is an often over-looked part of the problem - just look at the damage pro-Bush governments have done around the world. A weakened UN, discarded treaties and protocols... What it amounts to is basically a watered-down version of "democracy" being held increasingly higher as a banner for war and corporate profit.

As a planet, we need to take stock of where the juggernaut of "civilization" is taking us. Together, we can all set a new course. But it's gonna take some work!
Fromt he same Alternet comments thread:
I am an amateur performance musician who had performed at least twenty times a year (with my wife on bass) since 1994 in various small venues. But in 2004, my muse finally deserted me and now I can no longer play my guitar without it being a chore. I realized that it is because I don't want to perform for nameless Americans anymore. I don't like them and I don't approve of them. I have nothing to sing to them.
I know that feeling. I walk the streets of Australia nowadays knowing that most of the people around me have voted for John Howard again and again and again - even knowing he was a War Criminal (and if they didn't know that, they should have)!

What to do? Walk on! To quote Camus:
We must imagine Sisyphus happy.
How Can Anyone Be So Stupid?

Pamela Anderson in Israel, via TBogg: :
I spent the morning in East Jerusalem which is mostly Arab. The differences between the Jewish areas and the Arab areas is to break your heart. It is inexplicable to me why the Arabs would live in such abject squalor, throwing their garbage in the streets when they could all work together with the Jews for a far better life. But Jihad Islam will never let that happen.
There's a career in GOP politics waiting for you, Pam...
US Out Of UN!

Mike Whitney asks Kofi Annan to expell the USA from the UN Security Council:
I think you'll agree that the UN cannot survive if one of its members on the Security Council supports the idea of unilateral warfare...

You must convene an emergency meeting of the General Assembly to decide whether the United States should be immediately removed from the Security Council. I think you will find that there is broad international support for this proposal. Once the matter is resolved then the US and Israel will be forced to prosecute their conflicts without the mask of international legitimacy...

The administration has decided that it will run the world directly from Washington; transforming the UN into a "cats-paw" for America's geopolitical ambitions. In fact, John Bolton's package of "Reforms" has been nothing more than a blueprint for turning the UN into a fully-owned franchise of the multinational corporations, the international banking establishment and Israel.

This must be stopped.

It is up to you, Mr. Secretary, to put an end to this farce and restore the credibility of the institution.
I am not sure that Kofi has the power to throw the USA off the Security Council, but he may have the power to suspend their veto.
Bush Cabal Ignores Senate, Supremes

Alberto Gonzales:
"We can detain any combatants for the duration of the hostilities," Gonzales told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

"If we choose to try them, that's great. If we don't choose to try them, we can continue to hold them," he said.
This is the same Senate Armed Services Committee before which Rumsfeld has disdained to appear, despite a summons. Apparently he is too busy doing things to even tell anyone what he is doing.
Conservatives = Terrorists

NY Times receives second white powder envelope, again with the patriotic 9/11 stamps.
Holding Them To Account

Bravo. BBC NEWS calls Bullshit on Blair:
"Suddenly, without warning, Hezbollah who have been continuing to operate in Southern Lebanon for two years in defiance of UN Resolution 1559, cross the UN blue line, kill eight Israeli soldiers and kidnap two more. They then fire rockets indiscriminately at the civilian population in Northern Israel," he said.

(In fact, four of the Israeli soldiers were killed in south Lebanon after crossing over in pursuit of their missing comrades).

He did not however address in detail the contradiction that some might see in this speech. How do you extend the values of moderation by pursuing war, as in Iraq, which might in itself increase the level of extremism in response?

...

"Hezbollah gets their weapons from Iran. Iran are now also financing militant elements in Hamas. Iran's president has called for Israel to be 'wiped off the map'. And he's trying to acquire a nuclear weapon."

The phrase "wiped off the map" has been challenged as to whether it should be taken entirely literally, though it does express President Ahmedinejad's hostility to Israel as a state. And Mr Blair's claim that Iran is "trying to acquire a nuclear weapon" goes beyond what the International Atomic Energy Agency has reported and what Iran has said.
The Short, Insane Reign Of PM Ehud Olmert

... is surely heading towards an unhappy ending. Hezbollah today fired at least 206 rockets into Israel, their highest daily tally to date. One landed just inside the West Bank.
In Jerusalem, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told Reuters Israel would fight on until an international force reaches south Lebanon - even though no country has volunteered to send troops in the absence of a truce and a durable cease-fire agreement...

Mr Olmert said earlier Hezbollah's infrastructure had been "entirely destroyed" in the Israeli offensive.
Doesn't really sound like it, does it?

Olmert appears to have been walked into a corner by the Israeli military. This will not end well for him, for Israel, for the Lebanese or anybody else. Except maybe the US arms dealers who will get another boost in sales to replenish Israel's weaponry. Funded by US taxpayers of course.
Back To The 1700's

The Australian government's appalling plan to imprison asylum seekers aboard floating detention centres takes our country back more than 200 years, to the days when the British Government used to house criminals on aging vessels in the Thames. Eventually the British decided to ship them all the way to Australia, and a nation was born. How disgraceful that we should now inflict similar misery on new-comers to our shores.
Then another child was pulled from under the rubble, and another followed, and then another. You go a little crazy when you see little body after little body coming up out of the ground. I looked around me and all I could see in the house was the detritus of their short lives....
Orwell's Grave

Wingnuts discover the systematic abuse of American MPs by the al-Qaeda terrorists at Guantanamo Bay. I kid you not.
Haditha: A Case To Answer

U.S. probe implicates Marines:
Evidence collected on the deaths of 24 Iraqis in Haditha supports accusations that U.S. Marines deliberately shot the civilians, including unarmed women and children, a Pentagon official said Wednesday.

August 02, 2006

Iraq Madness

Army Commander Investigated in Iraq Killing Spree: soldiers were under orders to kill all military-age males.
Yes, Officials Really LIED to 9/11 Panel

9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon and even considered criminal referals to the Justice Department:
For more than two years after the attacks, officials with NORAD and the FAA provided inaccurate information about the response to the hijackings in testimony and media appearances. Authorities suggested that U.S. air defenses had reacted quickly, that jets had been scrambled in response to the last two hijackings and that fighters were prepared to shoot down United Airlines Flight 93 if it threatened Washington.

In fact, the commission reported a year later, audiotapes from NORAD's Northeast headquarters and other evidence showed clearly that the military never had any of the hijacked airliners in its sights and at one point chased a phantom aircraft -- American Airlines Flight 11 -- long after it had crashed into the World Trade Center.

Maj. Gen. Larry Arnold and Col. Alan Scott told the commission that NORAD had begun tracking United 93 at 9:16 a.m., but the commission determined that the airliner was not hijacked until 12 minutes later. The military was not aware of the flight until after it had crashed in Pennsylvania.

These and other discrepancies did not become clear until the commission, forced to use subpoenas, obtained audiotapes from the FAA and NORAD, officials said. The agencies' reluctance to release the tapes -- along with e-mails, erroneous public statements and other evidence -- led some of the panel's staff members and commissioners to believe that authorities sought to mislead the commission and the public about what happened on Sept. 11.

"I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described," John Farmer, a former New Jersey attorney general who led the staff inquiry into events on Sept. 11, said in a recent interview. "The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years. . . . This is not spin. This is not true."
UPDATE: The full Vanity Fair article here, including online audio from NORCOM.
Tracing The Origins Of The Middle East Crisis

Via the ICH Comments, an excellent quote from Mahatma Ghandi in 1938:
"Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs. What is going on in Palestine today cannot be justified by any moral code of conduct. The mandates have no sanction but that of the last war. Surely it would be a crime against humanity to reduce the proud Arabs so that Palestine can be restored to the Jews partly or wholly as their national home."
(This was published on 26 November 1938 in Harijan, Mohandas K. Gandhi's magazine).
The Old Dr Evil Syndrome

I suspect the thing that really gets wankers like Blair and Howard off, and the reason why they have supported the Bush neo-cons against all logic, is that they love playing the big stadium.

What I mean by that is, they like to imagine themselves on a higher stage than their domestic contemporaries, or even their predecessors in office. So here, for example, we have Blair threatening Syria and Iran, again with that wild gleam in his eyes, again with his sweeping hand movements.



It's the same thing for the neo-conservatives, small-minded men who have wormed their way into the corridors of power. No wonder they all dismiss their critics so easily and so consistently. It's the old Dr Evil Syndrome, isn't it?
"I am a genius, dammit! How can you fools even begin to understand the forces with which I grapple day and night?!"
Wanking at home, wanking on the big stage: it's still wanking.
What It Takes, Sometimes

The stolen elections of 2000 and 2004 were not just about the failures of Al Gore and John Kerry. They were also about the failures of the people who supported them.
On Monday, the presidential candidate slept alongside thousands of supporters camping out on the streets.
Would millions of Democrats have poured onto the streets to support Gore or Kerry, if they had been asked to so so? We will never know.
Bush dismisses cease-fire calls as "stopping for the sake of stopping".
Misguided Anger, In So Many Ways

Two anti-semitic attacks in Sydney. Another at a New Zealand Jewish synagogue. Damn you, Mel Gibson!
Jimmy Carter states the obvious:
It is inarguable that Israel has a right to defend itself against attacks on its citizens, but it is inhumane and counterproductive to punish civilian populations in the illogical hope that somehow they will blame Hamas and Hezbollah for provoking the devastating response. The result instead has been that broad Arab and worldwide support has been rallied for these groups, while condemnation of both Israel and the United States has intensified...

There will be no substantive and permanent peace for any peoples in this troubled region as long as Israel is violating key U.N. resolutions, official American policy and the international "road map" for peace by occupying Arab lands and oppressing the Palestinians.
Hill Democrats Unite to Urge Bush to Begin Iraq Pullout
Back to Beirut v.1982?

Robert Fisk says A Nato-led force would be in Israel's interests, but not Lebanon's:
So when this latest foreign army arrives, count the days - or hours - to the first attack upon it. Then we'll hear all over again that we are fighting evil, that "they" - Hizbollah or Palestinian guerrillas, or anyone else planning to destroy "our" army - hate our values; and then, of course, we'll be told that this is all part of the "War on Terror" - the nonsense which Israel has been peddling. And then perhaps we'll remember what George Bush senior said after Hizbollah's allies suicide-bombed the Marines in 1982, that American policy would not be swayed by a bunch of "insidious terrorist cowards".

And we all know what happened then. Or have we forgotten?
Neo-con Blog Watch

Looking back, I think I was wrong to suggest that "Iraq The Model" was a CIA front. But I was certainly right about one thing:
The "Iraq The Model" blog exists not for the sake of its authors or their fellow Iraqis, but for the sake of its many pro-war US visitors.
At the time, I didn't really understand the complex web of competing entities that exist within the halls of power in the USA. The CIA is just one of these, and they are not the sort of people to set up a miserable little PR blog like ITM.

For example, Cheney and Rumsfeld have a long history of battling the CIA. Within the CIA itself, there is an on-going civil war of sorts. The White House is basically in thrall to the neo-cons, who have their own widespread agenda. Then there's the State Department and a whole host of other groups, each pushing their own power trolley down the aisles of the superpower supermarket. And battles between these groups are waged on multiple fronts, with each new crisis eliciting new positions from each group. Only long-time, seasoned insiders have any real idea of what is really going on.

Over time, however, it has become clear that the Fadhil brothers have remained true to the vision of one group in particular, and that is the neo-cons. Remember, Paul Wolfowitz frequently used to cite ITM as an inspirational "good news" Website, and that was way back in 2003.

So it comes as no surprise that Ali Fadhil is again blogging at Free Iraqi as follows:
As horrible as it may seem I do wish the war between Israel and Hezbollah goes on and on, that it spreads to involve Iran and Syria. I feel terrible for the losses among the innocents, Lebanese and Israeli, but I think that this is the only way for them, and us to finally have some peace.
He wrote that back on July 18th. Prescient, hunh? And this bit could come straight out of Michael Ledeen's mouth:
Call me what you want but I say let it rage and rage until it burns all dictators and terrorists in the region. Just like I wished for war in my country I wish it for the Lebanese, Syrians and Iranians. God be with them and get the good souls out of it safe. This war is just another battle in the war on terror and we won't see peace in Iraq, we won't see democracy anywhere in the ME until this war is fought the right way, with full determination. With each battle fought it'll get easier and easier to win this war even if each battle looked like it's very hard to win on its own.
I hope I live long enough to discover the truth about the Fadhil brothers and their US supporters. The truth will out, as they say.
Demand a CeaseFire Now at www.ceasefirecampaign.org.
Help John Howard Get A Clue

PM John Howard asks Australians to help him do his job:
"I mean if anybody says there's some magical solution to the high price of petrol in Australia, will you please ring the Lodge and I'll spend an hour all-ears listening to them."
Well, he IS a clever little bastard, isn't he? Because the phone number for the Lodge is not publicly available! IF you know it, please email me at bmail.com.au and I will be happy to explain how NOT INVADING MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES, IN CLEAR VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW might help improve things a bit.

UPDATE: Unable to find a phone number, I emailed the PM instead. I suggest readers do likewise.
Mr Howard,

When asked about today's interest rate rise, you blamed it on rising petrol prices and said:

"I mean if anybody says there's some magical solution to the high price of petrol in Australia, will you please ring the Lodge and I'll spend an hour all-ears listening to them."

I tried to find a phone number for the Lodge, but without success. If a phone number is available, please let me know. Otherwise please call me on [number removed for privacy] and I will be very happy to spend an hour or more explaining to you how NOT ILLEGALLY INVADING MIDDLE EASTERN NATIONS might usefully contribute to lower oil prices around the globe.

I have never in my life been ashamed to be an Australian, but your government pushes me to the limits every day. Your continued failure to condemn Israel for it's assault on Lebanese civilians is only the latest instance of a morally bankrupt government in thrall to global business interests, foreign ideologues and domestic pressure groups.

Your departure from the Lodge cannot come soon enough.
Adventures with the CIA in Turkey: Interview with Philip Giraldi
Totally Irresponsible US Journalism

From George Gedda at Forbes: White House Ready to Help Cuba.
With Cuban President Fidel Castro ailing, the Bush administration said the United States is prepared to support a democratic transition on the island.

Castro, who underwent surgery for an intestinal problem, surrendered power temporarily to his brother, Raul, No. 2 in the chain of command.

White House press secretary Tony Snow said there are no plans to reach out to Raul Castro.

"Raul Castro's attempt to impose himself on the Cuban people is much the same as what his brother did," Snow said. "The one thing that this president has talked about from the very beginning is his hope for the Cuban people, finally, to enjoy the fruits of freedom and democracy."

Snow added: "The one thing we want to do to is to continue to assure the people of Cuba that we stand ready to help."

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said the United States has no doubt that the Cuban people are weary of communist rule after 47 years and are eager to choose their leaders rather than having them imposed on the country.
Here's Bush:
If Fidel Castro were to move on because of natural causes, we've got a plan in place to help the people of Cuba understand there's a better way than the system in which they've been living under.
Sic.
After urging Lebanese civilians to flee the south, Israel now begins bombing the north.
Howard, We Barely Knew Ye...

Zionist stooge Howard Dean proves he never deserved the Democrat nomination:
"The Iraqi prime minister is an anti-Semite."
So why the fuck did Dean dick everybody around for so long? Why did he suddenly withdraw when he suddenly came within sight of winning?

Tales for another day...

UPDATE: How Howie lost his groove:
Ironically, during the 2004 campaign Dean called on the United States to be an "evenhanded" broker in the Middle East. That position enraged party leaders such as House minority leader Nancy Pelosi, who signed a letter attacking his remarks. "It was designed to send a message: No one ever does this again," says M.J. Rosenberg of the center-left Israel Policy Forum. "And no one has. The only safe thing to say is: I support Israel."
That comes from an excellent report on AIPAC in the Nation this week:
In early March, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) held its forty-seventh annual conference in Washington. AIPAC's executive director spent twenty-seven minutes reading the "roll call" of dignitaries present at the gala dinner, which included a majority of the Senate and a quarter of the House, along with dozens of Administration officials...

On July 18, the Senate unanimously approved a nonbinding resolution "condemning Hamas and Hezbollah and their state sponsors and supporting Israel's exercise of its right to self-defense." After House majority leader John Boehner removed language from the bill urging "all sides to protect innocent civilian life and infrastructure," the House version passed by a landslide, 410 to 8.

AIPAC not only lobbied for the resolution; it had written it. "They [Congress] were given a resolution by AIPAC," said former Carter Administration National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, who addressed the House Democratic Caucus on July 19. "They didn't prepare one."

AIPAC is the leading player in what is sometimes referred to as "The Israel Lobby"--a coalition that includes major Jewish groups, neoconservative intellectuals and Christian Zionists. With its impressive contacts among Hill staffers, influential grassroots supporters and deep connections to wealthy donors, AIPAC is the lobby's key emissary to Congress. But in many ways, AIPAC has become greater than just another lobby; its work has made unconditional support for Israel an accepted cost of doing business inside the halls of Congress. AIPAC's interest, Israel's interest and America's interest are today perceived by most elected leaders to be one and the same...

"There remains a perception of power and fear that AIPAC can undo you," says James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute. He points to the defeats of Representative Paul Findley and Senator Charles Percy in the 1980s and Representatives Cynthia McKinney and Earl Hilliard in 2002, when AIPAC steered large donors to their opponents. Even if AIPAC's make-you-or-break-you reputation is largely a myth, in an election year that perception is potent. Thirty-six pro-Israel PACs gave $3.14 million to candidates in the 2004 election cycle...

AIPAC continues to enjoy deep bipartisan backing inside Congress even after two top AIPAC officials were indicted a year ago for allegedly accepting and passing on confidential national security secrets from a Defense Department analyst.

By blindly following AIPAC, Congress reinforces a hard-line consensus: Criticizing Israeli actions, even in the best of faith, is anti-Israel and possibly anti-Semitic; enthusiastically backing whatever military action Israel undertakes is the only acceptable stance.

Recent Gallup polls show that half of Americans support Israel's military campaign, yet 65 percent believe the United States should not take sides in the conflict. But it's hard to imagine any Congress, or subsequent Administration, returning to the role of honest broker. What the region needs now, according to Brzezinski, is an American leader brave enough to say: "Either I make policy on the Middle East or AIPAC makes policy on the Middle East." One can always dream.

August 01, 2006

Rare clouds over Antarctica suggest global warming.
Arianna Loses It

I am normally a big HuffPo fan, Arianna, but you have totally lost me on this one.

She says Mel Gibson's DUI arrest could be "a seminal moment in our cultural history."
I see the Gibson story as "a moment of opportunity," a chance for reasonable people to stand up and be counted. For the sane among us to identify, separate, and condemn the extremists, the fanatics, the fundamentalists, the bigots, the hate-mongers and say 'no more.'

In the same way that ordinary Muslims need to separate themselves from the blood-drenched ideology of Hezbollah, Hollywood needs to separate itself from the odious racism of Gibson. And I don't make that connection lightly. Remember, during his DUI tirade, Gibson claimed, "The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world." That kind of thinking makes him psychological soul mates with Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, who has said, "If we searched the entire world for a person more cowardly, despicable, weak, and feeble in psyche, mind, ideology, and religion, we would not find anyone like the Jew."

Gibson's no-longer-deniable brand of bigotry has led to the extermination of millions...
Oh, puh-lease! Who's the one guilty of "lunatic ravings" here?

Let's firstly note the fact that Gibson was pissed off his face (and immediately retracted his statements when sober), then calmly consider where he is coming from. This is a guy who was loudly slammed as an anti-Semite because he made a movie which accurately represented events surrounding the death of Jesus. Of course, Jewish groups were outraged because it make them look bad. But hey! They actually were bad, at that time, in that place, in that context. Doesn't mean all Jews are bad, Gibson never said they were, and I certainly don't think they are either, yadda, yadda ... Whaddaya want a goy to do, come up with the standard Hollywood schmalz ending? Smack a kind-hearted rabbi at the foot of the cross just to make it more "fair and balanced"? That is the same sort of "invent your own reality" nonsense as the Bush neo-cons practice (and HuffPo always criticizes).

Now since making Passion, Gibson has been shunned as an anti-Semite across Bush's USA. Who stands up for him in such a barren landscape? Nobody. If you don't think Jewish groups have been making his life difficult for the past few years, Arianna, then Gibson probably has a few interesting stories to tell you. Ya ever been to Hollywood, girl?

Then we have the nightly news bulletins from southern Lebanon for the past two weeks. You wont get your Bush White House or your news anchors on CNN criticizing the Israelis for War Crimes (oooooh, NO!) but you can be damn sure that's what the rest of us around the world are seeing (I recommend SBS as a news source for anyone in Australia, like me, or in the USA and wanting a bigger picture).

You think you go blowing up women, kids, ambulances and UN buildings on the TV News every night and you are not going to stir up a bit of hot-blooded resentment? I want to kick my TV set and scream every night in anguish. Not at Jewish people because they are Jews, but at the whole damn thing, particularly the criminal silence by supposedly "Democratic" leaders who are too spineless to even call for a ceasefire.

Add a big dose of alcohol to that mix, blend in a history of harrassment by Jewish groups, and maybe NOW you start to see where Gibson was coming from.

Listen, personally I don't even like the guy that much. And I'm an Aussie! But if you are not going to cut the guy some slack, at least don't try to turn this minor incident into "a seminal moment in our cultural history". Isn't HuffPo always criticizing others for turning news into entertainment? Let's keep it real. The only way this is ever going to turn into a "seminal cultural moment" for the USA is if Jewish groups and the US media (including HuffPo?) insist on extracting a pound of Gibson's flesh, in which case maybe the fallout will help a few people see who is really running their country.

Yeah, you heard THAT right. Wake up and look around, folks. Mel Gibson is not your biggest problem right now.

Arianna, how about full disclosure on your own links to AIPAC and other Jewish pressure groups?
From Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan

Freewayblogger's Best. Impeach. Ever.

Nothing To Do With Bush, Of Course

Nothing whatsoever:
North Korean and South Korean soldiers have exchanged gunfire in the demilitarised zone dividing the two Koreas, a South Korean newspaper reported.
Heckuva Job, Miller

US army honours Guantanamo, Iraq chief:
The man who commanded the Guantanamo prison and helped shape detention practices at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq, retired from the US military with a top honour and praise from the Army.

Major General Geoffrey Miller headed the prison camp for foreign terrorism suspects at the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, from 2002 to 2004 and was sent to Iraq in 2003 to help extract more information from prisoners there.

He oversaw all detention operations in Iraq for nine months in 2004...

Military investigators last year recommended that Miller be admonished for failing to monitor and limit the "abusive and degrading" interrogation of a prisoner. But the general who headed US Southern Command rejected the recommendation.

The Army inspector general's office also cleared Miller.
In Which I Blog Like Jeffrey Goldstein
University cocktail party conversation between a young undergraduate and an aging paedophile:

"And what do you do, sir?
"I am a teacher."
"Oh, really? What do you teach?"
"Well, it is a bit unusual, I suppose. But since you ask: I teach Advanced Female Masturbation Techniques."
"Oh..."
"As I say, it is an unusual topic. Some people are quite inhibited about even discussing such things..."
"Oh, sure..."
"I have a couple of places available in the coming semester, if you are interested."
"Oh, um... How many students do you normally teach?"
"Well, normally a maximum of two per semester. It's quite intensive, as you will see."
Qana

Robert Fisk asks 'How can we stand by and allow this to go on?'
No one in this country can forget how President George Bush, Ms Rice, and Tony Blair have repeatedly refused to call for an immediate ceasefire - a truce that would have saved all those lives yesterday.


My sentiments exactly. How far have we fallen.
Conyers To Bush: "I'm Gonna Do You Slowly"

No, that quote was actually Paul Keating to John Hewson. Still, it's the kind of talk that I like to hear! From TPM:
Could a Democrat victory in November bring Watergate-style hearings?
The MuckRacker story is based on John Conyers' new report, "A Constitution in Crisis":
The Bush administration may have broken over two dozen federal laws and regulations -- some of them multiple times -- according to an unreleased report from the House Judiciary Committee Democrats.

"The misconduct I have found is not only serious, but widespread," reads a draft summary of the report by Ranking Member John Conyers (D-MI)... It is several hundred pages long, with over a thousand footnotes.

In earlier days such a report would be easily ignored. But with the looming possibility of Democrats taking control of the House of Representatives in November, Conyers' charges pose a potentially serious threat to the Bush administration. After all, it takes only a simple majority vote in the House to impeach a sitting president.

On their face, the laundry list of alleged wrongs form a natural basis for impeachment proceedings -- but Conyers has insisted he has no intention of rushing to impeach. No, a slow walk to possible impeachment (preferably down a path that includes months of hearings) is more what the would-be chairman envisions, he has said.

Pages

Blog Archive