Qui Custodiat Custos?

Read this.

It's about which judges are being assigned which cases in relation to big Bush scandals, and it is pretty scary stuff. You should read it all the way through to fully appreciate what's going on here.

Judge Reggie Walton, a Bush appointee and former Bush staffer whose involvement in the Sibel Edmonds case has multiple extraordinary question marks hanging over it, will also be presiding over the Scotter Libby case. 'Nuff said? Not quite!

In what kind of country is a judge appointed to try his own former colleagues, who themselves are being defended by other former colleagues?

How is it that Walton and a handful of other judges keep getting assigned such cases? And why on earth is every single line in Judge Walton's financial disclosure form (PDF here) blacked out?