The Iraqi government is working on a new hydrocarbons law that will set the course for the country's oil sector and determine where its vast revenues will flow. The consequences for such a law in such a state are huge. Not only could it determine the future shape of the Iraqi federation -- as regional governments battle with Baghdad's central authority over rights to the riches -- but it could put much of Iraqi oil into the hands of foreign oil companies...
Nevertheless, the draft law lays the ground work for private oil companies to take large stakes in Iraq's oil. The new law would allow the controversial partnerships known as 'production sharing agreements' (PSA). Oil companies favor PSAs, because they limit the risk of cost overruns while giving greater potential for profit. PSAs tend to be massive legal agreements, designed to replace a weak or missing legal framework -- which is helpful for a country like Iraq that lacks the laws needed to attract investment.
It's also dangerous. It means governments are legally committing themselves to oil deals that they've negotiated from a position of weakness. And, the contracts typically span decades. Companies argue they need long-term legal security to justify huge investments in risky countries; the current draft recommends 15 to 20 years.
Nevertheless, Iraq carries little exploratory risk -- OPEC estimates Iraq sits atop some 115 billion barrels of reserves and only a small fraction of its oil fields are in use. By signing oil deals with Iraq, oil companies could account for those reserves in their books without setting foot in the country -- that alone is enough to boost the company's stock. And, by negotiating deals while Iraq is unstable, companies could lock in a risk premium that may be much lower five or ten years from now.
Without drastic improvements in the security situation, companies are unlikely to begin operations anytime soon. "The legislation is not a golden bullet," one industry source told SPIEGEL ONLINE. Western oil companies are happy to receive Iraqi officials in their European headquarters, but are not keen to return the visit. Firms from China, Russia and India, however, are less intimidated by Iraq's precarious security situation and actively court Baghdad on its home turf.
Russia, after all, knows first hand what's at stake. They negotiated PSAs after the fall of communism, but the terms turned out to be so disadvantageous that they've taken to nationalizing the projects in question. Not unlike Iraq today, Russia then had weak governance and needed the money.
That's why some fear Iraq is setting its course too hastily and in too much secrecy. Greg Muttitt of social and environmental NGO Platform London told SPIEGEL ONLINE: "I was recently at a meeting of Iraqi MPs (members of parliament) and asked them how many of them had seen the law. Out of twenty, only one MP had seen it."
Last week, the Iraqi Labor Union Leadership suggested the same. "The Iraqi people refuse to allow the future of their oil to be decided behind closed doors," their statement reads. "(T)he occupier seeks and wishes to secure themselves energy resources at a time when the Iraqi people are seeking to determine their own future while still under conditions of occupation."
Many worry instability would only get worse if the public feels cheated by the government and multinationals -- the Iraqi constitution says the oil belongs to the Iraqi people. The Labor Union Leadership warned: "We strongly reject the privatization of our oil wealth, as well as production sharing agreements, and there is no room for discussing the matter. This is the demand of the Iraqi street, and the privatization of oil is a red line that may not be crossed."
Peter Eigen, chairman of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, a body that aims to bring improved governance in resource-rich countries, told SPIEGEL ONLINE that an open debate is crucial. "Civil society and private sector should play a role in this," he said. "If this doesn't happen, it will just be another country where the blessing of petroleum has been turned into a curse."
Why so fast?
Oil is central to Iraq's reconstruction and economic recovery, and the U.S. government is urging Iraq to develop the sector quickly. The recent Iraq Study Group report recommended the US help Iraq "prepare a draft oil law" to hasten investment. The report estimates Iraq could raise oil production from 2 million to 3 or 3.5 million barrels per day over the next three to five years.
Critics say the US is leaning on the IMF and World Bank to push Iraq into signing oil contracts fast, so western firms can secure the oil before Chinese, Indian and Russian firms do. An IMF official told SPIEGEL ONLINE that "passage of a hydrocarbon law is not a condition for financial support from the IMF." Nevertheless, Iraqi authorities found it necessary to promise the IMF a draft petroleum law by the end of this year -- this in the same letter that says "we will take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that the program remains on track."
The IMF sets the conditions for Iraq's debt relief from the so-called Paris Club countries. Eighty percent of that debt has been wiped clean, and the final 20 percent depends on certain economic reforms. With the final reduction, Iraq's debt would come to 33 percent of its GDP -- but if the reforms are not made, debt would climb to 57 percent of GDP, according to an IMF report.
Criticisms have also been levelled against the World Bank, where former US deputy defense secretary Paul Wolfowitz is in charge. Wolfowitz has been accused of pushing a US agenda after opening a World Bank office in Baghdad.
Most agree that Iraq should develop its oil -- the question is how and how fast. Apart from the law's content, Eigen stresses the drafting process must be transparent for any law to succeed: "Everything that is done behind closed doors will probably have to be renegotiated later."
December 26, 2006
The Race For Iraq's Resources:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Pages
Blog Archive
-
▼
2006
(2154)
-
▼
December
(140)
- Big Oil In The Dept InteriorNew York Times: The Ju...
- Riverbend: My only conclusion is that the American...
- Bush Loses The ArmyDamning stuff: Poll: Troops Dis...
- Saddam HangedJosh Marshall unloads with both barre...
- Gitmo Gets A Kangaroo CourthouseVia TPMmuckraker: ...
- Bush Is Reading AgainI am starting to wonder if th...
- Crisis? Watch The MoneyOil edges higher, Iran bris...
- Layer Upon Layer Upon LayerIs Cheney trying to bla...
- The Race For Iraq's Resources:The Iraqi government...
- Report: Japan developing nuclear warhead. Nuff said!
- It looks like there is a global nuclear arms race ...
- The Middle East Nuclear Arms RaceTry to see it the...
- Uncle Sam's Middle EastScary words from Bob Gates:...
- 2006: Don't Look Back?The Nation reviews 2006: A Y...
- Breaking The ShacklesMax Hastings previews Gordon ...
- The Question Is WHY Don't They Want You To Know Th...
- Mohammed and its most common alternative spelling,...
- Jeb Spits: "No Tengo Futuro"Even Jeb Bush hates Du...
- So what happened to John Conyers? Seems he has dec...
- William M. Arkin says Bush can't see past today's ...
- The Mahablog has a great look at the USA's unhealt...
- The Corporate Occupation Of IraqThe untold story f...
- Bush: Acknowledging Reality Would Damage My Legacy...
- Condi Rice: Child Prodigy or Stupid, Lying Bitch?H...
- So much for Bush's crap about "listening to the co...
- Contractors Lost in Pentagon Bureaucracy: The Pent...
- Bush TalksBush gave the WaPo a 25-minute interview...
- NO MORE VICTIMS!!!!Bringing It All Back Home: "The...
- After giving Bush the thumbs-up for an increase in...
- Growing The Military, Grabbing The Oil, and Waggin...
- Even The Iraqis Think The War Was A Terrible Mista...
- Five days before Christmas, David Hicks refuses to...
- Breaking: Blair Bullshit BombshellFrom the UK's In...
- Bush Versus EisenhowerThe US military is today str...
- Vanity Fair Nails The NeoconsThe piece is called N...
- Who Speaks For The Victims of War? You? This is Um...
- Sean Penn: So...look, if we attempt to impeach for...
- Kucinich: We could exit Iraq in sixty days: CQ: Th...
- After a little prompting from TPM, the Pentagon fi...
- Team America, Fuck Yeah!For real: U.S. Special For...
- I have no idea why this happened to me. My eyes w...
- Maybe He Doesn't Inhale It?Bush is drinking again ...
- Tony Blair: Nothing Left But SpiteTony Blair stabs...
- Iraqslogger, a new Iraq-devoted blog with some ser...
- I always liked Matt Damon. He says Bush should sen...
- BushWorld: Amazing Coincidence #45,879,032,655,870...
- Fiddling With Politics While Baghdad BurnsJosh Mar...
- Anti-war Activists: On To Afghanistan? Here's Ted ...
- Laura Bush Wins Wanker Of The DayI think it could ...
- Over 90% of Iraqis Believe Iraq Is Worse Now Than ...
- Ho Ho Ho! An agent commented: "The presence of par...
- Slipping Out The Back Door...Bye Bye, Karl Rove: T...
- Tony Snowjob explains why the US now does body cou...
- Saudi Arabia's Own Civil WarUS denies Saudis threa...
- Kitty Does OprahI always wondered why such a high-...
- Globalization Is Hurting Our Children: A Graphic E...
- Bush's USA.
- Bush Is Truly and Completely FUCKEDWhen you are ge...
- Keep Eye On CheneyJoe Galloway: The power brokers ...
- Terrrrst Bullshit Goes Into OrbitU.S. warns of thr...
- Breaking news from Talking Points Memo: It's being...
- Iraq Becomes A Shiite-Sunni SandwichThings just go...
- Tony Snow DeathwatchDana Milbank throws off the "l...
- Josh Marshall explains the Neocon World vision: We...
- I Bombed Your House, Raped Your Wife, Slaughtered ...
- Rumsfeld: There Is No War On TerrorExit Rumsfeld, ...
- "Oil of course is the critical asset in Iraq"A rou...
- MELTDOWN LOOMS Bush is still saying History will v...
- Iraq As A Football GameA good analogy from PHILOSO...
- Intelligence Is Still Being Fixed Around PolicyUS ...
- Shame on me, I have never heard of Tony Karon: thi...
- That Other Civil WarCraig Crawford: "The Iraq comm...
- Bush The Torturer-In-ChiefIs this going to be the ...
- It's (Still) The Oil, StupidAs the Los Angeles Tim...
- ISG Report author Lee Hamilton: "It all depends on...
- The War On Words: Latest UpdateBlair's UK walks aw...
- Bush to resign? You wish! A less confrontational a...
- IMPEACH! Rep. Cynthia McKinney's parting gift to C...
- It's The Permanent Bases, StupidRecommendation 22 ...
- Bush Goes On OprahNot really, but surely this is k...
- Am I the only dialup user who has noticed that it ...
- Do me a favour: sign this petition demanding a Cea...
- The UnthinkableJimmy Carter goes where no major US...
- Sinking Fast, Stalling For TimeJosh Marshall says ...
- Bush: "It’s bad in Iraq."
- US military spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Christoph...
- Spinning Towards InfinityThis whole Iraq War has a...
- Bloody LanguagePilger: Language was, and is, cruci...
- Damn StraightWilliam Arkin via Eschaton: Here's ho...
- Wired News: The first public meeting of a Bush adm...
- Understanding Israeli NukesIn all the hullaballoo ...
- Feeling ItDan Froomkin strolls down Memory Lane: "...
- How Stupid?From Newsweek: Think the Balkans, Rwand...
- Iraq, Aii!From Stars and Stripes: U.S. criminal ga...
- Stalling For TimeSo what exactly did the Iraq Stud...
- Bye Bye Tony SnowCountdown begins: Snow Loses All ...
- Another BOOM! YearU.S. Predicts Bumper Year in Arm...
- Just So You KnowWhen Bush declares Martial Law in ...
- Simple SolutionsHow do you defeat the terrrrsts in...
- Tom the Dancing Bug in good form.
-
▼
December
(140)
No comments:
Post a Comment